HIV Care Cascade

Uses

Benefits

Risks & contraindications

Comparisons

Evidence quality

Highlighted claims

• Almost one-quarter of adult people with HIV (PWH) in the cohort were newly diagnosed through the SchistoTrack study itself. — HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack
• The majority of PWH (71.3%) access ART at a clinic other than the geographically nearest facility. — HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack
• No statistically significant differences in any care cascade measure were found between PWH who reported fishing activities and the general PWH population. — HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack
• Among adults already aware of their HIV-positive status, 97% reported currently being on ART. — HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack
• Status awareness is the primary gap in the care cascade relative to the UNAIDS 95–95–95 targets in these communities. — HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack
• The overall care cascade in these communities (78–97–93) is broadly comparable to the Uganda national UPHIA benchmark (81–96–92). — HIV testing and prevalence in fishing communities in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional study of 3197 individuals within SchistoTrack