Human trust signals
Cross-source consensus on Human trust signals from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Uses
How it works
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Expert oversight had negative willingness-to-pay across all analysed user profiles. — Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for AI-enabled blended type 2 diabetes care by digital experience and socioeconomic status: a discrete-choice experiment in China
- The study interprets human oversight as a baseline safety feature rather than a paid premium add-on. — Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for AI-enabled blended type 2 diabetes care by digital experience and socioeconomic status: a discrete-choice experiment in China
- Physician endorsement and in-person follow-up may already provide enough human assurance to reduce the value of separately priced oversight. — Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for AI-enabled blended type 2 diabetes care by digital experience and socioeconomic status: a discrete-choice experiment in China
- Embedding expert oversight as a core non-priced feature may support adoption better than selling it as an add-on. — Patient preferences and willingness-to-pay for AI-enabled blended type 2 diabetes care by digital experience and socioeconomic status: a discrete-choice experiment in China