IA Training
Cross-source consensus on IA Training from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- There is no nationally agreed standard for IA training. — Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Inconsistent IA training produced variation in technique, interpretation, counting method, and documentation. — Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Teaching fetal physiology as applied to IA increased midwives' confidence and clinical reasoning. — Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- When fetal physiology was not taught, midwives lacked a framework for interpretation, reasoning, and escalation. — Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Some sites did not teach fetal physiology as applied to IA monitoring. — Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)
- Structured shadowed practice and mentoring supported less confident midwives in two sites. — Facilitators and barriers to the practice of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in UK maternity services: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)