Immunohistochemistry
Cross-source consensus on Immunohistochemistry from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
How it works
Comparisons
Background
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- Immunohistochemistry detects Mycobacterium leprae antigens directly in tissue samples using monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies. — Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol
- The diagnostic accuracy of IHC for leprosy has not yet been systematically synthesised. — Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol
- The first published immunohistochemistry study appeared in 1941, and the first report of IHC detecting M. leprae in tissue was published in 1983. — Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol
- Compared with immunofluorescence, IHC provides better morphological evaluation without fluorescence decay or specialised optical systems. — Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol
- IHC antibodies with apparently specific reactivity to Mycobacterium leprae target PGL-1 and lipoarabinomannan. — Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol
- IHC may outperform direct bacilloscopy because it can detect antigens even when bacilli are no longer viable. — Sensitivity of immunohistochemistry in the laboratory diagnosis of leprosy: a systematic review protocol