Implementation Frameworks
Cross-source consensus on Implementation Frameworks from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Uses
How it works
Other
Highlighted claims
- The study uses four established frameworks, each for a different analytical purpose. — The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care
- The SEIPS model treats patient safety as an outcome of interactions among people, tasks, tools, environment, and organisation. — The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care
- The RE-AIM evaluation measures reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. — The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care
- The Person-Centred Practice Framework supports measurement of person-centred culture and acceptability throughout the study. — The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care
- PARiHS guides Phase 2 workshop activities for implementation change in the GP-RACH setting. — The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care
- RE-AIM structures Phase 3 evaluation of the real-world intervention impact. — The GRACE video-telehealth project protocol: a mixed-methods study to improve quality, safety and acceptability of video-telehealth in Australian general practice and residential aged care