Implementation Variation
Cross-source consensus on Implementation Variation from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
How it works
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- Adaptability also created wide variation across sites. — Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England
- Virtual ward implementation was complex because it involved many stakeholders, teams, systems, and local contexts. — Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England
- Vague NHS England criteria led to different interpretations of eligibility and operating models. — Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England
- Local adaptation was valued, especially when existing services could be expanded rather than built from scratch. — Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England
- Pre-existing infrastructure allowed some sites to scale virtual wards more quickly. — Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England
- Services built from scratch were slower to implement but better aligned with NHS England criteria. — Factors affecting implementation of hospital inpatient-level care at home: a qualitative study of virtual wards in North West England