Informed Consent Procedures
Cross-source consensus on Informed Consent Procedures from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
How it works
Preparation
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Twenty-five documents focused on consent procedures for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and cognitive disabilities, consistently emphasizing autonomy and presumption of competence. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review
- Surrogate or supported decision-making should be used only when individually appropriate, not as a blanket default applied to all people with disabilities. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review
- Researchers and ethics board members must not assume that disability precludes consent capacity; individual capacity assessments using tailored methods must be employed instead. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review
- Consent materials must be provided in accessible formats such as plain language and visual aids, and extended time for decision-making must be allowed. — Equitable inclusion of people with disabilities in clinical trials: a scoping review