Integrated Risk Communication
Cross-source consensus on Integrated Risk Communication from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Benefits
Preparation
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Providers identified a gap in communicating integrated risk that combines polygenic scores, monogenic findings, and non-genetic factors. — Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences
- Participants found it difficult to explain Mendelian and polygenic inheritance together and to present multiple risk figures in one consultation. — Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences
- Genetic healthcare providers considered many existing complex risk communication skills transferable to polygenic risk scores. — Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences
- Useful integrated risk education resources include sample explanations, analogies, visual aids, role-play videos, and practice-based examples. — Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences
- Providers saw polygenic risk scores as a possible way to support preventive health behaviour, but they felt undertrained in behaviour change methods. — Preparing healthcare providers to use polygenic risk scores: a qualitative study of learning needs and educational preferences