Intervention Limitations
Cross-source consensus on Intervention Limitations from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Risks & contraindications
Highlighted claims
- Single-centre recruitment limits the generalisability of the study. — Effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial protocol
- Lack of participant and provider blinding may create expectation bias. — Effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial protocol
- Smartphone requirements may exclude older adults, people with more severe disability, and people with lower digital literacy. — Effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial protocol
- The self-reported primary outcome may introduce subjective bias. — Effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial protocol
- The supermarket game scenario may require adaptation for other regions. — Effect of a digital resilience-based course-game sequential intervention on social participation in stroke survivors with limb dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial protocol