Isolation Precautions
Cross-source consensus on Isolation Precautions from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- A meta-analysis of four HCAHPS isolation studies estimated pooled satisfaction among isolated patients at 69%. — Patient satisfaction with infection prevention and control interventions in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Isolation precautions were the most frequently studied IPC intervention in the review. — Patient satisfaction with infection prevention and control interventions in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- HCAHPS top-box satisfaction responses among isolated patients ranged from 58.3% to 73%. — Patient satisfaction with infection prevention and control interventions in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- The isolation meta-analysis showed substantial heterogeneity. — Patient satisfaction with infection prevention and control interventions in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- The pooled isolation satisfaction estimate was below common international inpatient-care benchmarks. — Patient satisfaction with infection prevention and control interventions in acute hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis