Item Reduction
Cross-source consensus on Item Reduction from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- Items were removed over five rounds of analysis. — Patient-reported experience measures for person-centred care: a survey for the development and psychometric testing of a targeted measure, the EPCC-14
- The initial full item set had psychometric problems including high fit residuals, local dependency, and failure to meet unidimensionality criteria. — Patient-reported experience measures for person-centred care: a survey for the development and psychometric testing of a targeted measure, the EPCC-14
- Three initial items showed uniform differential item functioning by age. — Patient-reported experience measures for person-centred care: a survey for the development and psychometric testing of a targeted measure, the EPCC-14
- Retention decisions balanced statistical evidence with theoretical considerations, conceptual value, clinical relevance, and patient-identified wording. — Patient-reported experience measures for person-centred care: a survey for the development and psychometric testing of a targeted measure, the EPCC-14
- The refinement process considered whether retained items represented key person-centred care domains such as information-sharing, shared decision-making, care planning, and goal-setting. — Patient-reported experience measures for person-centred care: a survey for the development and psychometric testing of a targeted measure, the EPCC-14
- The initial 57-item analysis had properly ordered response thresholds, indicating participants used response categories as intended. — Patient-reported experience measures for person-centred care: a survey for the development and psychometric testing of a targeted measure, the EPCC-14