Kirkpatrick and Phillips Evaluation Frameworks
Cross-source consensus on Kirkpatrick and Phillips Evaluation Frameworks from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
How it works
Preparation
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The Kirkpatrick model evaluates training programmes at four levels: Reaction, Learning, Behaviour and Results. — Utilisation of simulation-based training to teach bedside management of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: a scoping review protocol
- The Phillips model extends the Kirkpatrick model by adding a fifth level assessing return on investment. — Utilisation of simulation-based training to teach bedside management of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: a scoping review protocol
- Reviewers will receive training on the Kirkpatrick and Phillips ROI frameworks before charting data because these concepts are specific to healthcare simulation. — Utilisation of simulation-based training to teach bedside management of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: a scoping review protocol
- Many simulation studies demonstrate effectiveness only at lower Kirkpatrick levels, with cost and ROI analyses remaining rare. — Utilisation of simulation-based training to teach bedside management of acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: a scoping review protocol