LMIC Rehabilitation Context
Cross-source consensus on LMIC Rehabilitation Context from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Only 5.7% of participants in the ECLIPSE model's evidence base came from LMICs, limiting its transferability to those settings. — Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation (LLA) and prosthetic rehabilitation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings: a qualitative systematic review
- Psychological rehabilitation services, well-documented in HICs, appear largely unavailable in LMIC settings, leaving the mechanisms of psychosocial adjustment unknown. — Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation (LLA) and prosthetic rehabilitation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings: a qualitative systematic review
- The absence of pain and falls from LMIC rehabilitation narratives may reflect cultural stoicism, terrain normalisation, or limited research scope rather than a true absence of those problems. — Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation (LLA) and prosthetic rehabilitation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings: a qualitative systematic review
- Evidence from other conditions shows LMIC patients emphasise life-impact factors such as ability to work and fulfil social roles more than HIC patients. — Exploring meaningful outcome domains of recovery following lower limb amputation (LLA) and prosthetic rehabilitation in low- and middle-income (LMIC) settings: a qualitative systematic review