Local Employment
Cross-source consensus on Local Employment from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- Employment data included anonymised employee-level residence and ethnicity information. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- Across seven trusts with employment data, 87% of staff lived within the Greater Manchester ICB footprint. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- The proportion of locally employed staff ranged from 82.7% to 89.5% across trusts. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- High local employment does not by itself satisfy community wealth building aims because stronger anchor practice requires targeted recruitment and skills pathways. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- The employment data could not distinguish local community recruitment from staff who moved locally after recruitment. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England