Local Evidence
Cross-source consensus on Local Evidence from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- Local evidence is essential for NITAG recommendations that fit national epidemiological, socioeconomic, and health system contexts. — Exploring the links between NITAGs and academic institutions: a landscape analysis protocol
- LMICs, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, face major challenges in generating and using local evidence. — Exploring the links between NITAGs and academic institutions: a landscape analysis protocol
- Context-specific evidence includes cost-effectiveness, values and preferences, local epidemiology, and disease burden. — Exploring the links between NITAGs and academic institutions: a landscape analysis protocol
- Weak surveillance, limited research infrastructure, funding constraints, fragmented data systems, and limited human resources constrain local evidence in LMICs. — Exploring the links between NITAGs and academic institutions: a landscape analysis protocol
- Deficits in local evidence can force LMIC NITAGs to rely on global or regional data that may miss country-specific realities. — Exploring the links between NITAGs and academic institutions: a landscape analysis protocol