Local Procurement
Cross-source consensus on Local Procurement from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The procurement analysis measured the proportion of non-pay spending within the Greater Manchester ICB footprint. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- Across nine trusts, 21% of total non-pay spend was spent within the Greater Manchester ICB footprint in 2022/2023. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- Local procurement varied substantially between trusts, ranging from 6.4% to 52.7% of total non-pay spend. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- Low local procurement may reflect structural constraints rather than lack of anchor intent. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England
- Future procurement analysis should examine whether local strategies help small and medium enterprises participate in NHS supply chains. — How to measure the effectiveness of healthcare providers acting as an ‘anchor institution’: a case study of the NHS in Greater Manchester, England