Measurement Invariance
Cross-source consensus on Measurement Invariance from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- Measurement invariance was tested across sex, age group, and course. — Development and psychometric validation of the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) using item response theory (IRT): a cross-sectional study among Brazilian higher education students
- The invariance results support valid comparisons by sex, age group, and medicine versus other programmes. — Development and psychometric validation of the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) using item response theory (IRT): a cross-sectional study among Brazilian higher education students
- The invariance testing hierarchy included configural, metric, and threshold invariance. — Development and psychometric validation of the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) using item response theory (IRT): a cross-sectional study among Brazilian higher education students
- Configural models showed excellent fit across sex, age, and course. — Development and psychometric validation of the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) using item response theory (IRT): a cross-sectional study among Brazilian higher education students
- Approximate fit changes were used because large samples make chi-square difference testing overly sensitive. — Development and psychometric validation of the 8-item Student Quality of Life Index (IQoL) using item response theory (IRT): a cross-sectional study among Brazilian higher education students