MIHYS NICHE Trial
Cross-source consensus on MIHYS NICHE Trial from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Uses
Where it comes from
Other
Highlighted claims
- The economic evaluation was conducted alongside the MIHYS NICHE randomised controlled trial. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- The trial randomised 208 women equally between LNG-IUS and HNR. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- The study was conducted at a single university hospital in Shanghai. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- The evaluation followed participants for 12 months and assessed the main cost-effectiveness endpoint at 6 months. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
- Eligible participants were women aged 18-48 years with postmenstrual spotting after caesarean section and MRI-confirmed niche suitability for HNR. — Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysteroscopic niche resection for caesarean scar–related spotting in China: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial