Mixed-Methods Delphi Study
Cross-source consensus on Mixed-Methods Delphi Study from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The focus group phase involved three virtual sessions with 18 purposively selected participants. — Developing a national framework for health technology assessment in Iran: a mixed-methods Delphi consensus study
- The Delphi phase involved 20 HTA experts from Iranian universities, research centres, and policy institutions. — Developing a national framework for health technology assessment in Iran: a mixed-methods Delphi consensus study
- The Delphi process achieved 84% overall consensus across framework components. — Developing a national framework for health technology assessment in Iran: a mixed-methods Delphi consensus study
- The Delphi process achieved full response across all three rounds. — Developing a national framework for health technology assessment in Iran: a mixed-methods Delphi consensus study
- The study used a three-phase mixed-methods design involving review, focus groups, and Delphi consensus. — Developing a national framework for health technology assessment in Iran: a mixed-methods Delphi consensus study
- Five independent experts validated the framework after the Delphi rounds. — Developing a national framework for health technology assessment in Iran: a mixed-methods Delphi consensus study