Mixed-Methods Study Design
Cross-source consensus on Mixed-Methods Study Design from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Other
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- The protocol uses a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design across three phases, with each phase informing the next. — Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers’ use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study
- The study is oriented by the pragmatism paradigm to generate actionable knowledge for practice change and a future pragmatic trial. — Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers’ use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study
- The study uses the CFIR Innovation Domain to identify contextual factors relevant to protocol development and dissemination. — Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers’ use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study
- The integration plan connects Aim 1 sampling, Aim 2 survey trends, and Aim 3 qualitative analysis into joint displays and meta-inferences. — Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers’ use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study
- Both agreement and discordance between quantitative and qualitative findings are treated as analytically meaningful. — Attitudes, opinions and practice patterns regarding anaesthesia providers’ use of vasopressors: protocol for a multicentre mixed-methods study