MolClock
Cross-source consensus on MolClock from 2 sources and 9 claims.
2 sources · 9 claims
Uses
How it works
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- A methylation clock trained only on skin samples was developed because the Horvath clock had limited skin-age accuracy. — Skin Methylation Age Clock
- Using skin-specific methylation data made the model more accurate at predicting skin biological age. — Skin Methylation Age Clock
- Training on skin samples helps the clock capture methylation patterns most relevant to skin aging. — Skin Methylation Age Clock
- The Mo clock was reported to predict skin age better than other available clocks for this use case. — Skin Methylation Age Clock
- MolClock is biopsy-based, making studies invasive and expensive. — OS-01 Peptide, Skin Aging, and Systemic Inflammation
- MolClock was developed because general clocks such as the Horvath clock were not sufficiently accurate for skin in OneSkin's work. — OS-01 Peptide, Skin Aging, and Systemic Inflammation
- MolClock uses skin-only samples to predict skin biological age more accurately than broader clocks. — OS-01 Peptide, Skin Aging, and Systemic Inflammation
- MolClock enabled testing of peptides and products using methylation profiles before and after treatment. — OS-01 Peptide, Skin Aging, and Systemic Inflammation
- A non-invasive method for collecting enough biological material to measure skin age is described as a future goal. — OS-01 Peptide, Skin Aging, and Systemic Inflammation