Monitoring Devices
Cross-source consensus on Monitoring Devices from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- Implantable loop recorders were the only monitoring-only devices in the review that required an invasive procedure. — Understanding patient preferences, experiences and engagement with ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring: a scoping review
- Patch ECG devices were often preferred because they were lightweight, wireless, water resistant, discreet, and comfortable. — Understanding patient preferences, experiences and engagement with ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring: a scoping review
- Holter monitors and implantable loop recorders required little patient involvement after fitting, while event recorders and wearables often required activation. — Understanding patient preferences, experiences and engagement with ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring: a scoping review
- Holter monitors were criticized for being large, visible, and disruptive. — Understanding patient preferences, experiences and engagement with ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring: a scoping review
- Event recorders and smartphone-based devices could be forgotten because they required patient activation. — Understanding patient preferences, experiences and engagement with ambulatory heart rhythm monitoring: a scoping review