Multicriteria Decision Analysis
Cross-source consensus on Multicriteria Decision Analysis from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Benefits
Other
Highlighted claims
- Lower rank values represented higher priority. — Application of the WHO new vaccine introduction prioritisation and sequencing framework to guide evidence-based vaccine introduction decisions in Iran, 2025–2030
- Voting participants ranked candidate vaccines for each criterion, with rank 1 indicating the highest priority. — Application of the WHO new vaccine introduction prioritisation and sequencing framework to guide evidence-based vaccine introduction decisions in Iran, 2025–2030
- Mean ranks were calculated for each vaccine and criterion, then weighted mean ranks were calculated separately for importance and feasibility. — Application of the WHO new vaccine introduction prioritisation and sequencing framework to guide evidence-based vaccine introduction decisions in Iran, 2025–2030
- The importance-feasibility matrix kept public health importance and practical feasibility visible at the same time. — Application of the WHO new vaccine introduction prioritisation and sequencing framework to guide evidence-based vaccine introduction decisions in Iran, 2025–2030
- Final decisions used structured discussion and contextual judgement rather than only marginal numerical differences. — Application of the WHO new vaccine introduction prioritisation and sequencing framework to guide evidence-based vaccine introduction decisions in Iran, 2025–2030