Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer
Cross-source consensus on Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Uses
Benefits
Dosage & preparation
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- NAT-C was delivered to 96% of eligible intervention-practice participants in the study. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
- NAT-C is a one-page consultation guide for identifying, triaging and reducing unmet needs among people with cancer and their carers. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
- NAT-C supports holistic assessment by separating needs manageable in primary care from those needing external referral. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
- NAT-C consultations had a median duration of 24 minutes, which was longer than standard primary care appointments. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
- NAT-C was viewed as valuable, relevant and legitimate for primary care cancer care. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
- NAT-C helped clinicians uncover unmet needs that might not otherwise be detected or raised by patients. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer