NeoBeat Monitoring
Cross-source consensus on NeoBeat Monitoring from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Other
Highlighted claims
- NeoBeat was attached soon after delivery and detects heart rate by QRS complexes. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- NeoBeat use during caesarean delivery was challenging because the device could not be sterilised or covered sterilely. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- Heart rate was recorded every second for 10 minutes using good-quality NeoBeat signals or manually checked visible readings. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- Pulse oximetry and cabled ECG may be delayed or unreliable in the first minutes after birth, especially in the operating theatre. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- No increase in postoperative wound infections was observed, although the study was not powered to detect small differences. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)