Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
Cross-source consensus on Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Uses
Benefits
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- No prior study had directly compared tDCS and TMS efficacy or assessed prolonged tDCS therapy in PPA. — Long-term effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (RECONNECT-PLUS)
- A prior randomized trial by the same group associated active TMS with mitigation of brain metabolic decline and improvements in clinical outcomes. — Long-term effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (RECONNECT-PLUS)
- Non-invasive brain stimulation is presented as a promising adjunctive approach for PPA treatment. — Long-term effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (RECONNECT-PLUS)
- Most prior NIBS studies in PPA used tDCS and reported short-term benefits, but their findings were inconsistent. — Long-term effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (RECONNECT-PLUS)