Non-Invasive Indicators
Cross-source consensus on Non-Invasive Indicators from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The study evaluated six non-invasive indicators, split between disease-specific fatty liver indices and broader metabolic indicators. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- All six indicators showed acceptable discrimination under all three disease definitions. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- Most indicators performed best under the MAFLD framework. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- Disease-specific indicators were generally superior for identifying NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study
- TyG and VAI were stable across diagnostic criteria, unlike several other indicators. — Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study