Non-Pharmacological Interventions
Cross-source consensus on Non-Pharmacological Interventions from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Uses
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Other
Highlighted claims
- The planned review evaluates five broad categories of non-pharmacological care for HFpEF. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- The protocol aims to compare relative efficacy and safety because trial findings have been inconsistent and no consensus exists on the best approach. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Control groups may receive standard treatment or another non-pharmacological intervention. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- The review will consider intervention modality, frequency, period, and adherence during data extraction. — Comparison of the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials