Non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns

Cross-source consensus on Non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns from 1 sources and 6 claims.

1 sources · 6 claims

Uses

Evidence quality

Other

Highlighted claims

The study detected NRFHRPs in 19.2% of participating labouring mothers. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
NRFHRPs are operationally defined by repeated abnormalities including tachycardia, bradycardia, reduced or absent variability, or repeated decelerations. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
Non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns are used as an intrapartum indicator of possible fetal compromise. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
Tachycardia was the most common abnormality among NRFHRP cases in the study. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
Caesarean section was the main response used for NRFHRP cases in the study. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study
Electronic fetal monitoring has a very high false-positive rate for predicting true metabolic acidosis. — Prevalence of non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns and associated factors among labouring mothers at public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2024: A cross-sectional study