Opt-Out Consent
Cross-source consensus on Opt-Out Consent from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Preparation
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Participants were cross-referenced against the National Data Opt-Out database and excluded if they had registered an opt-out. — Opinions of the UK general public and stroke survivors in using artificial intelligence and ‘opt-out’ models of consent in medical research: a qualitative study
- The study created a local opt-in register so people registered with the NDOO could voluntarily include their data in ABSTRACT. — Opinions of the UK general public and stroke survivors in using artificial intelligence and ‘opt-out’ models of consent in medical research: a qualitative study
- All focus group and interview participants, and about 60 of 61 survey respondents, accepted the opt-out approach for this study. — Opinions of the UK general public and stroke survivors in using artificial intelligence and ‘opt-out’ models of consent in medical research: a qualitative study
- AI research commonly uses deidentified data under an opt-out framework because individual consent at very large scale is impractical. — Opinions of the UK general public and stroke survivors in using artificial intelligence and ‘opt-out’ models of consent in medical research: a qualitative study
- Some participants recommended broader offline advertising of opt-out information to include less digitally engaged people. — Opinions of the UK general public and stroke survivors in using artificial intelligence and ‘opt-out’ models of consent in medical research: a qualitative study