Outcome Analysis

Cross-source consensus on Outcome Analysis from 1 sources and 4 claims.

1 sources · 4 claims

Comparisons

The primary outcome is the number of treated items named accurately at 3-month follow-up. — Adaptive balancing of effort, accuracy and response speed in anomia treatment for post-stroke aphasia in community-based settings in the USA: a within-subjects randomised controlled trial protocol
The primary analysis uses item-level generalized linear mixed-effects modeling with a binomial distribution and logistic link. — Adaptive balancing of effort, accuracy and response speed in anomia treatment for post-stroke aphasia in community-based settings in the USA: a within-subjects randomised controlled trial protocol
The effect of interest is whether Adaptive BEARS improves 3-month naming accuracy more than both static conditions. — Adaptive balancing of effort, accuracy and response speed in anomia treatment for post-stroke aphasia in community-based settings in the USA: a within-subjects randomised controlled trial protocol
Secondary analyses include connected-speech use of treated words, untreated-word comparisons, follow-up time points, discourse analyses, motivation, and communication function. — Adaptive balancing of effort, accuracy and response speed in anomia treatment for post-stroke aphasia in community-based settings in the USA: a within-subjects randomised controlled trial protocol