Ovarian Cancer Follow-Up
Cross-source consensus on Ovarian Cancer Follow-Up from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Background
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Ovarian cancer follow-up in the Netherlands is largely doctor-driven and focused on recurrence. — Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial
- More than 75% of ovarian cancer patients recur within 24 months despite surgery and chemotherapy. — Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial
- Physical examination is poorly suited for detecting recurrence in this follow-up context. — Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial
- Early treatment of asymptomatic recurrence has not been shown to improve survival or health-related quality of life. — Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial
- Routine imaging or routine CA-125 monitoring is not considered useful for ovarian cancer follow-up in this context. — Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial
- Dutch national guidelines permit personalised ovarian cancer follow-up options, but standard in-person consultations are usually used in the study region. — Towards personalised follow-up care in ovarian cancer using online remote PROMs monitoring: a study protocol of a feasibility trial