Paediatric Robotic Surgery
Cross-source consensus on Paediatric Robotic Surgery from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- Robotic-assisted surgery extends minimally invasive surgery by adding precision, dexterity, stable visualisation, ergonomics, motion scaling, and tremor filtration. — Robotic-assisted endoscopic procedures in paediatric urology, gynaecology and general surgery: protocol for a multicenter observational registry study (MiniTrust study)
- The advantages of robotic assistance are considered especially relevant for children because smaller patients have limited working space and are affected by instrument size. — Robotic-assisted endoscopic procedures in paediatric urology, gynaecology and general surgery: protocol for a multicenter observational registry study (MiniTrust study)
- The study hypothesises that Senhance safety and performance are equivalent to comparable conventional paediatric laparoscopic procedures. — Robotic-assisted endoscopic procedures in paediatric urology, gynaecology and general surgery: protocol for a multicenter observational registry study (MiniTrust study)
- Traditional paediatric laparoscopy has limitations that the Senhance system may help address. — Robotic-assisted endoscopic procedures in paediatric urology, gynaecology and general surgery: protocol for a multicenter observational registry study (MiniTrust study)
- Routine use of the system may reduce hospital stay and improve patient-reported pain compared with conventional laparoscopy. — Robotic-assisted endoscopic procedures in paediatric urology, gynaecology and general surgery: protocol for a multicenter observational registry study (MiniTrust study)