Pain Science Messaging
Cross-source consensus on Pain Science Messaging from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Benefits
Comparisons
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- BP+PS education includes additional messages helping participants understand the complex nature of pain, including the role of the brain and nervous system. — Perceptions of best practice, pain science and structure-focused education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a content analysis of qualitative data from a randomised experiment
- Adding pain science to best practice education produced the most consistently positive emotional profile, with the highest rate of positive feelings at 35%. — Perceptions of best practice, pain science and structure-focused education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a content analysis of qualitative data from a randomised experiment
- The BP+PS group reported the highest rate of feeling validated or cared for. — Perceptions of best practice, pain science and structure-focused education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a content analysis of qualitative data from a randomised experiment
- The incremental benefit of pain science messaging over best practice education alone appears small in terms of treatment preferences. — Perceptions of best practice, pain science and structure-focused education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a content analysis of qualitative data from a randomised experiment
- Pain science content may enhance the patient experience — reducing frustration and increasing feelings of validation — without substantially changing treatment preferences relative to best practice education alone. — Perceptions of best practice, pain science and structure-focused education for rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a content analysis of qualitative data from a randomised experiment