Patient-Reported Experience Measures

Uses

Risks & contraindications

Evidence quality

Highlighted claims

• PREMs capture patient experiences of communication, respect, shared decision-making, care coordination, and care quality. — Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) used in ambulatory palliative care for adult patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
• The review will include PREMs used with adult cancer patients receiving ambulatory palliative care in LMICs. — Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) used in ambulatory palliative care for adult patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
• The review applies COSMIN methodology to assess PREM methodological quality and measurement properties. — Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) used in ambulatory palliative care for adult patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
• Western PREMs may be poorly aligned with high power-distance healthcare cultures where patients may not expect autonomy or shared decision-making. — Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) used in ambulatory palliative care for adult patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol
• Social desirability and courtesy bias can affect PREM responses by discouraging negative reports about care. — Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) used in ambulatory palliative care for adult patients with cancer in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol