Physiology-Based Cord Clamping
Cross-source consensus on Physiology-Based Cord Clamping from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Benefits
Preparation
Risks & contraindications
Other
Highlighted claims
- Modified physiology-based cord clamping used heart rate, breathing, and cord appearance to guide when the cord was clamped. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- Cord clamping occurred only after breathing had started in all included cases. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- Cord clamping did not produce a measurable heart rate impact in this study. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- Early cord clamping before ventilation can cause cardiovascular instability by reducing preload to the newborn heart. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)
- The absence of a heart rate drop after cord clamping may be related to clamping after breathing began. — Heart rate trends in healthy newborns ≥35+0 weeks’ gestation after caesarean delivery with extrauterine placental transfusion and physiology-based cord clamping: a Norwegian observational study (INTACT-3)