Prehabilitation
Cross-source consensus on Prehabilitation from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- High-quality randomised studies are still needed specifically in revision hip surgery. — Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance
- Pain and substantial morbidity may prevent some people with problematic hip replacements from participating in physical interventions. — Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance
- The article treats enhanced recovery, physical prehabilitation, nutritional prehabilitation, and combined approaches as potentially beneficial for revision surgery outcomes. — Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance
- The authors hypothesise that prehabilitation could improve outcomes in elective hip revision. — Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance
- Individually tailored prehabilitation may help address participation limits caused by morbidity and pain. — Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance