Primary Care Capacity

Cross-source consensus on Primary Care Capacity from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Preparation

Primary care capacity was the dominant barrier to implementing NAT-C. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
The article concludes that lack of system capacity, rather than lack of perceived value, was the main barrier to wider implementation. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
Resource needs included funding, staff, training time, administrative capacity, management support and IT systems. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
Clinicians became less confident after delivering NAT-C that adequate resources and management support would be available. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer
Some clinicians worried that finding unmet needs without capacity to address them would create ethical and practical problems. — Mixed methods process theory evaluation to explore the implementation issues of the Needs Assessment Tool-Cancer (NAT-C) in primary care for people with cancer