Primary Care Practices
Cross-source consensus on Primary Care Practices from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Where it comes from
Highlighted claims
- The study took place in general practices in Bristol, Southampton, and Staffordshire. — Implementation of a comprehensive template to support personalised care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation in primary care
- All practices used EMIS electronic patient records, had at least 5000 registered patients, and had access to Ardens templates. — Implementation of a comprehensive template to support personalised care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation in primary care
- Practices in more deprived areas were prioritised because multimorbidity is more prevalent there. — Implementation of a comprehensive template to support personalised care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation in primary care
- Sustainability varied across practices, with some normalising the process, some planning modifications, and some achieving limited change. — Implementation of a comprehensive template to support personalised care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation in primary care
- Administrative and IT fit varied by practice, including booking longer appointments, coordinating reviews, and adapting recall systems. — Implementation of a comprehensive template to support personalised care for people with multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods evaluation in primary care