Prior International Studies
Cross-source consensus on Prior International Studies from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- This Canadian study differs from prior international work by reaching consensus on formal and informal care use, quality of care, and access barriers and facilitators. — Developing a minimum dataset for a national patient registry on Long COVID in Canada: a Delphi consensus-based study
- The dataset was designed for registry use rather than clinical trials or research studies, with brevity as a primary constraint. — Developing a minimum dataset for a national patient registry on Long COVID in Canada: a Delphi consensus-based study
- Recommended instruments from prior work were too lengthy for registry use, especially for people with Long COVID cognitive impairment and busy clinicians. — Developing a minimum dataset for a national patient registry on Long COVID in Canada: a Delphi consensus-based study
- Prior international tools focused on outcomes and did not adequately capture healthcare experience or access for a Canadian registry. — Developing a minimum dataset for a national patient registry on Long COVID in Canada: a Delphi consensus-based study