Priority-Setting Methodology

Cross-source consensus on Priority-Setting Methodology from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Evidence quality

The project used the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership process to identify unanswered research questions important to patients, caregivers, and clinicians. — Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
The JLA method used in the study is based on equal involvement, inclusivity, transparency, and commitment to evidence. — Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
The project governance included patients, bereaved caregivers, and clinicians in a 16-member Steering Group. — Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
More than 30 community organisations supported recruitment, survey dissemination, and sharing of final priorities. — Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
The evidence check classified a question as unanswered when no relevant review or guideline addressed it, when evidence was insufficient, or when evidence was too narrow. — Top 10 research priorities for adolescent and young adult cancer in Canada: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership