Priority Use Cases
Cross-source consensus on Priority Use Cases from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Uses
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- The four highest mean scores were immunocompromised adults, children with fever without a focus and amber or red flag signs, febrile infants aged 1-3 months, and febrile neutropenic children. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- The highest-priority use cases involved vulnerable patients and clinically uncertain presentations. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- In adult use cases, immunocompromised adults and adults with fever without a focus ranked similarly and significantly higher than other adult use cases. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- In paediatric use cases, fever without a focus, febrile infants aged 1-3 months, and febrile neutropenia ranked similarly and higher than other paediatric use cases. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- All 19 proposed use cases were considered at least moderately important, though some were clearly prioritised. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe
- Unwell older neonates aged 3-28 days ranked slightly above neonates under 3 days old, but this difference was not statistically significant. — Priorities for the development of a new rapid diagnostic test for patients with fever: a cross-sectional online survey among hospital physicians across Europe