Process Evaluation
Cross-source consensus on Process Evaluation from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
Uses
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The process evaluation was planned in advance to explain trial implementation, participation variation, and contextual factors. — Process evaluation of a basic life support educational intervention (FirstCPR cluster randomised study) delivered at community organisations in New South Wales, Australia
- The evaluation used a multimethod design alongside the FirstCPR trial. — Process evaluation of a basic life support educational intervention (FirstCPR cluster randomised study) delivered at community organisations in New South Wales, Australia
- The analysis followed the UK Medical Research Council process-evaluation framework. — Process evaluation of a basic life support educational intervention (FirstCPR cluster randomised study) delivered at community organisations in New South Wales, Australia
- The study-specific implementation score was descriptive and not validated as a fidelity or uptake measure. — Process evaluation of a basic life support educational intervention (FirstCPR cluster randomised study) delivered at community organisations in New South Wales, Australia