Psychometric Properties
Cross-source consensus on Psychometric Properties from 1 sources and 6 claims.
1 sources · 6 claims
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- Criterion validity and responsiveness were not assessed in any included study. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Measurement error was formally evaluated in only two studies. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Only ten of the thirty included articles assessed test-retest reliability. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- The review found widespread methodological deficiencies, especially in instrument development and content validity. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Structural validity varied, and three named instruments failed COSMIN CFA thresholds. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines
- Most instruments achieved sufficient internal consistency. — Psychometric properties of self-report instruments for assessing self-care in patients with oncological diseases: a systematic review based on COSMIN guidelines