Qualitative Study Design
Cross-source consensus on Qualitative Study Design from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- The study used a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory design. — Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study
- Participants were recruited using purposive and theoretical sampling to capture variation in experiences. — Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study
- Recruitment ended when theoretical saturation was reached. — Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study
- Semi-structured interviews explored perceived surgical benefits, burdens, and changes over time. — Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study
- Trustworthiness was supported through triangulation, comparison, member checking, and independent coding. — Dynamic trade-off evaluation framework for bariatric surgery outcomes: a qualitative Straussian Grounded Theory study