Quality and Outcomes Framework
Cross-source consensus on Quality and Outcomes Framework from 1 sources and 4 claims.
1 sources · 4 claims
How it works
Risks & contraindications
Comparisons
Highlighted claims
- QOF thresholds for the full SMI physical health check were set at 60–75% of eligible patients for 2024–25, yet NHS England planning guidance made no explicit reference to SMI physical health check targets. — Bridging the gap in the UK’s National Health Service integrated care systems: insights from a mixed methods implementation evaluation of UCLP-PRIMROSE, a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness
- QOF incentivisation of annual physical health checks produced an unintended consequence, concentrating resources on achieving screening volume targets at the expense of holistic care. — Bridging the gap in the UK’s National Health Service integrated care systems: insights from a mixed methods implementation evaluation of UCLP-PRIMROSE, a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness
- QOF incentivisation is useful for establishing a screening baseline but inadvertently disincentivises non-targeted preventive and holistic care. — Bridging the gap in the UK’s National Health Service integrated care systems: insights from a mixed methods implementation evaluation of UCLP-PRIMROSE, a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness
- Participants drew a clear distinction between measuring health parameters (e.g., recording blood glucose) and actually intervening to improve them (e.g., reducing blood glucose). — Bridging the gap in the UK’s National Health Service integrated care systems: insights from a mixed methods implementation evaluation of UCLP-PRIMROSE, a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness