RE-AIM Evaluation
Cross-source consensus on RE-AIM Evaluation from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Other
Highlighted claims
- The study uses the RE-AIM framework to evaluate reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. — Understanding the impact, reach and implementation of a health systems intervention to improve diabetes and hypertension care in pluralistic urban public primary care in Bangladesh: a study protocol
- Reach is assessed using facility records, census data, and qualitative interviews about access and counselling challenges. — Understanding the impact, reach and implementation of a health systems intervention to improve diabetes and hypertension care in pluralistic urban public primary care in Bangladesh: a study protocol
- Adoption is assessed by counting invited facilities and healthcare providers that accept, decline, begin, or discontinue implementation. — Understanding the impact, reach and implementation of a health systems intervention to improve diabetes and hypertension care in pluralistic urban public primary care in Bangladesh: a study protocol
- Implementation is evaluated through management process fidelity and qualitative evidence on training, barriers, facilitators, unintended consequences, and patient experience. — Understanding the impact, reach and implementation of a health systems intervention to improve diabetes and hypertension care in pluralistic urban public primary care in Bangladesh: a study protocol
- Maintenance is assessed using 12-month management process outcomes and qualitative interviews about continuation, discontinuation, and contamination. — Understanding the impact, reach and implementation of a health systems intervention to improve diabetes and hypertension care in pluralistic urban public primary care in Bangladesh: a study protocol