Recommendation Integrity
Cross-source consensus on Recommendation Integrity from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
Other
Other
Highlighted claims
- The evidence base will be repaired by removing problematic evidence from each recommendation. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol
- Meta-analyses that included retracted trials will have pooled effects recalculated after removing those trials. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol
- Affected recommendations are classified as unlikely, possibly, or likely distorted after reassessing the repaired evidence base. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol
- The study will judge whether each recommendation using problematic evidence is favorable toward an intervention or against it. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol
- A recommendation is assumed likely distorted if removing problematic evidence leaves no supporting evidence. — Investigating the impact of problematic evidence on clinical practice guidelines and associated patient outcomes (VITALITY Study II): protocol