Rectified Flow
Cross-source consensus on Rectified Flow from 1 sources and 5 claims.
1 sources · 5 claims
How it works
Benefits
Risks & contraindications
Evidence quality
Highlighted claims
- On the Checkerboard benchmark, vanilla RectFlow achieves SWD near 0.166 at both k=1 and k=2, no better than the base Flow Matching model, confirming that the bottleneck is the coupling integrator. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- In practice, the compounding improvement of iterative rectification fails because the bottleneck is the quality of the coupling integrator, not the loss function or model capacity. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- Image generation experiments evaluate only k=1 reflow because training costs scale with the number of rounds, leaving multi-round rectification on images undemonstrated. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- Rectified Flow addresses trajectory curvature by iteratively regenerating coupling data through forward integration of the previously trained model, then retraining on those self-generated pairs. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow
- Each successive reflow round is expected to produce a velocity field closer to linear, enabling few-step or single-step generation. — Divergence-Suppressing Couplings for Rectified Flow