Registration Consistency

Cross-source consensus on Registration Consistency from 1 sources and 5 claims.

1 sources · 5 claims

Risks & contraindications

Most confirmed cross-registrations with recruitment status in both records had the same mapped recruitment status. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
Only half of completed confirmed cross-registrations with dates in both registries agreed within the same year and month. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
Completion date discrepancies ranged from 1 to 110 months among discrepant cases. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
EUCTR recorded earlier completion dates more often than later completion dates in completed pairs. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres
Different completion dates can produce inconsistent verdicts on whether results reporting is overdue. — Accounting for cross-registration in monitoring transparency in clinical trials: a cross-sectional study of trials at German university medical centres